Management of Higher Educational Institutions

The society relies on the services on higher education institutions to develop future generations of responsible persons. Minus the services of higher educational institutions, society would be filled with persons with low professional and social portfolios (Brown Katz, 2009). For this reason, governments have put in place strategies that make access to the services of higher education much easier. Over the years, the ease of access to higher education has been made easier. These can be analyzed in terms of the number of higher educational institutions created and the reduced prices of servicing the institutions for educational purposes. In the United Kingdom, the situation is the same. The number of educational institutions in the U.K has increased significantly to cater for the rising demand (Howell, 2012). Additionally, the institutions have made it easier for the public to access the services. Government and educational bodies have also played a major role in creating a more accessible higher education sector. There have been measures in the United Kingdom that have ensured that higher educational institutions quote reasonable prices as fees (Andy, Jon Robert, 2010). For this paper, the main focus will be made in regards to the changes experienced by the Higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. The major change in the U.K. is the mandatory requirement by the institutions to reduce their charges on the tuition fees. From September 2012 universities across the United Kingdom are allowed to raise their tuition fees up to 9,000 annually. This change was protested by many educational bodies and stakeholder but at the gain of higher educational institutions. However, after the creation of these changes challenges started to arise on how this change could be managed. This is because students would aim to go to schools with the cheapest offering. In an argument by Levin (2012) the high demand for education limits the way in which institutions price their tuition fees. The author further points out that tuition fees in the United Kingdom would fluctuate differently in each institution in order to maintain competitiveness in the market (Levin, 2012). Additionally, due to the high fees, the government will offer bursaries to students. For this reason, an institution with the lowest fee quoted will be required to expand to cater for students who could not afford expensive institution. Institutions would also be required to quote cheaper tuition fees in order to capture the attention of the government in enabling them to acquire students benefiting from bursaries. Many institutions are now aiming at expanding their institutions by putting place mechanisms that would please both the government and the student population. However, other institutions in the United Kingdom remain reluctant to quote cheaper tuition fees arguing that quality offered requires more funds when compared to other institutions. The main change experienced by higher education institution in the United Kingdom is the fact that institutions have been provided a choice between enrolling more students and taking advantage of the raised maximum tuition fee range.